In the Spring of 2009 a patient asked me how I thought acupuncture worked in scientific terms. I’ve heard this question many times in ten years of practice and don’t have an answer, but told her I thought it had something to do with the undifferentiated nerve fibers that occur throughout the sub-dermal level of our bodies. These fibers were found in the 1990’s by scientists looking for something else, and are remarkable because they don't have a connection to the central nervous system. Those researchers thought that perhaps the fibers were involved in the pain response, but didn’t really know their purpose. I have always wondered if these undifferentiated nerve fibers might be associated with proprioception, but in any event I have reasoned that whatever else an acupuncture needle does, it penetrates this layer of nerve fibers when it is inserted into the body.
In casting about for a way to describe this that might make sense to my patient, a computer network specialist, I suddenly had an idea and said, “Maybe these undifferentiated nerve fibers work like a wireless computer network. Maybe what has been previously described as a mystical ‘aura’ or ‘subtle energy’ is actually like an internal wireless communication system between these fibers and the central nervous system.”
And I was pretty pleased with my metaphor.
However, my patient took it a step further the next day. She told me that in thinking about what I had said, it occurred to her that many wireless networks she had worked with periodically needed to be hard-wired to the server. After adding new hardware or software, you had to re-sync the wireless and the wired systems by briefly connecting them with a wire and re-booting. Maybe, she suggested, the acupuncture needle fulfills the role of the wire acting to re-sync the wireless system with the server.
Well, I have to give it to her. Exchanging physical, mental and spiritual trauma for the computer system’s hard and software trauma, I think this makes more sense than any other scientific explanation I have heard for describing the mechanism of acupuncture. The more I've tested it the more I have liked the analogy, but I have no idea how to turn it into a hypothesis capable of being tested. Still, it comes closer than other scientific ideas I have heard for describing at least part of the range of mechanisms I have witnessed in ten years of practicing and 20 years of receiving acupuncture.
Wonderful! Thanks for describing it all so beautifully!
ReplyDeleteThanks. You always manage to use analogies and metaphors to answer my questions so that I understand your responses.
ReplyDeleteThis explanation of the "art" of acupuncture makes it comprehensible. Kudos to you and your patient.
Thank you both for your kind comments. The next task is to figure out an experiment to test a hypothesis which is derived from this analogy. Maybe after I've finished the design for my human-powered flying machine...
ReplyDelete